Category Archives: Constitution

Con-Con or Con-Job

Image

With the federal government operating well out of its Constitutional boundaries, different solutions have emerged that claim to have the “silver bullet” answer to unconstitutional federal activity. One of the most dangerous and insidious is the call for a Constitutional Convention a/k/a Convention of States under Article V of the Constitution. While the promoters may have good intentions, they fall far short on historicity and understanding of the words and intentions of America’s Founding Fathers.

A Convention of States would open up the US Constitution and all its protections of rights, to meddling by contemporary politicians, many whom have already failed to hold back federal usurpations against it. The failure of elected officials to act to hold back federal power grabs suggests a fundamental lack of knowledge by the very elected officials who are sworn to uphold and protect the US Constitution. Yet a Constitutional Convention would be in their hands.

This very dangerous and chilling effort to rewrite the Constitution under the banner of a Convention of States could easily lead to a total remake of the Constitution and elimination of many protections now afforded US citizens. Here’s an example of how just five words could make a difference in an amendment. From The New American on-line comes a quote from Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens; “Stevens proposes adding five words to the present version of the Second Amendment. Stevens’ revised Second Amendment would read:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed.”

Chief Justice Warren Burger had this to say about a Constitutional Convention, “I have also repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda.” Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg said, “one of the most serious problems Article V poses is a runaway convention. There is no enforceable mechanism to prevent a convention from reporting out wholesale changes to our Constitution and Bill of Rights.”

The last Constitutional Convention in the US was 1787 and it resulted in the Articles of Confederation being tossed out and a completely new Constitution written.

In these times of bitter partisan bickering over different issues, does it really make sense to call a Constitutional Convention and risk a major rewrite to our precious document?

Promoters of a Constitutional Convention have legitimate goals and concerns. However, there are other far less dangerous methods to solve the nation’s ills. One is nullification. Founding Father James Madison had this to say about nullification, “The Constitution of the United States was formed by the sanction of the states, given by each in its sovereign capacity. … The states, then, being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity that there can be no tribunal, above their authority, to decide, in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated. “ In other words, the states are the highest authority – not the federal government.

Please contact your State Representative and State Senator and ask them to vote against any support for a Constitutional Convention and Convention of States.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Constitution

Do you miss me yet?

The US Constitution: Do you miss me yet?

The US Constitution: Do you miss me yet?

You may have seen the little banner ads with a picture of a grinning George W. Bush waving and saying, “Do you miss me yet?”

With all due respect Mr. Bush, we at the Constitution Party don’t miss you and we would love to be missing Mr. Obama right about now, too. You see, both of you answer to elites in Washington DC who have an agenda to destroy the American dollar and replace it with a single global currency. Once they do that, it’ll be even easier for elites to control the flow of money.

This is urgent business for globalists because the jig is almost up at the Federal Reserve. You know about the Federal Reserve, don’t you? This is the official government sounding name on your paper money. And it’s the private bank with secret ownership that is oh so cozy with the US federal government. You might be asking and rightfully so, why a private bank, owned by secret people, have this exclusive right to produce American currency.

But don’t ask. You’re not supposed to know and anyway, how would the United States fund its Great Society welfare programs without the Federal Reserve. Forget that the Federal Reserve is basically an illegal construct created by good ole boys like the Rockefellers, the Warburgs, and the Rothschilds. And that there was once a time, way back in 1983(?) when the average American Serf could go look at some of the ownership of the Federal Reserve.

That was in the old days before America was blended in to European style socialism and our government became like the Monarchial governments of France and Great Britain. Looking back, it was a glorious time. You actually knew that the Federal Reserve was at least partially owned by European American Bank, National Bank of North America, Bankers Trust, Morgan Guaranty Trust, and a number of foreign owned banks.

Today of course, the dollar is worth perhaps 5 cents versus its value in 1900. And incredibly, it still continues to decline in value.

For those of you who truly believe that it’s rich greedy oil companies jacking up the price of gasoline, please review how printing money out of thin air reduces the value of the dollar making you pay more for every item you buy.

The only way America can survive the attempts by the globalists to fold the US into a global empire by crashing the US dollar, is to wrest control of Washington DC from the Democrats and Republicans. And that means voting for Constitution Party candidates or even Libertarians (I am a Constitution Party member).

Here’s the Constitution Party solution to America’s fiat money crisis:

The Constitution Party recommends a substantive reform of the system of Federal taxation. In order for such reform to be effective, it is necessary that these United States:

  • Return to the money system set forth in the Constitution;
  • Repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and reform the current Federal Reserve banks to become clearing houses only; and
  • Prohibit fractional reserve banking.

It is our intention that no system of “debt money” shall be imposed on the people of these United States. We support a debt free, interest free money system.

What liberty lovers actually miss is the Constitution – not more oligarchs like Bush and Obama.

Leave a comment

Filed under Banking, Constitution

Independence Day – July 4 2011

Libya would like its independence back

Libya would like its independence back

Today is Independence Day 2011; an American holiday hated by the coalition forces of communists, atheists, fascists, socialists, neo-cons, and monarchist elites in control over the American education system, its government, and the churches. Using the mouthpiece media that has less credibility than Russia Today (another mouthpiece but for the Russian communists), propaganda issues forth daily on the virtues and wonders of the new socialist state of America.

Dictator Obama issues edicts in the form of Executive Orders from the Imperial White House that dictate how the serfs will live in the new Permission State. For example; Executive Order 13575 – Establishment of the White House Rural Council. This is an expansion of federal government reach into the rural areas of America where it currently has less socialist influence. Using the routine government template of, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you…”; Obama’s imperial order says: “The Council shall work across executive departments, agencies, and offices to coordinate development of policy recommendations to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in rural America, and shall coordinate my Administration’s engagement with rural communities.

I don’t know about you, but I live in a rural area. I don’t need nor desire any federal government bribes along with my police state initiative thank you.

Consider some of the other US federal government initiatives currently “making our lives better”. ObamaCare; the wholesale take-over of the US health care industry by the White House using their minions in Congress and the Senate. Bombing of the sovereign nation of Libya. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The ironically named “Patriot Act” where the Bill of Rights is suspended. Fascist bail-outs of banks, the auto industry, and an international insurance company, using your tax dollars. The deliberate and methodical destruction of the US dollar – a traitorous action which will ruin most Americans financially. And of course, the out of control spending by politicians who mirror  Denethor, Steward of Gondor in the Lord of the Rings. Watch him closely – that’s what your typical Senator or CongressThug is like.

How did the United States get to this pathetic state? Part of the journey was done for us by subversives who hate America and all she stands for. These groups were cited above. They have always hated and resented the freedom and liberty presented in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution by our Founding Fathers. Communists for example have dedicated their lives to the “Revolution” for well over 100 years. In fact, their religion is the revolution. That’s why they hate Christianity and work to defeat it in every arena they control.

And of course we can blame ourselves for letting us be force marched backwards into a totalitarian system where the serfs serve the Steward of Gondor and the rest of the idle royalty sitting in Washingtonian splendor. Just do a quick survey of your immediate family and friends. How many vote? Many elections are won with 10% or less of the electorate turning out. And should the ill informed be voting anyway?

How about the decline of morals in the US? America’s Founding Fathers in no uncertain terms specified the need for a moral people if freedom and liberty were to thrive. Consider these quotes from America’s Founding Fathers:

Noah Webster, author of the first American Speller and the first Dictionary said, “[T]he Christian religion, in its purity, is the basis, or rather the source of all genuine freedom in government. . . . and I am persuaded that no civil government of a republican form can exist and be durable in which the principles of that religion have not a controlling influence.”

James Wilson, Signer of the Constitution; U. S. Supreme Court Justice, “Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other.”

Benjamin Franklin, Signer of the Declaration of Independence “[O]nly a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.”

Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom as Ben Franklin so wisely counseled. The more corrupt we become as a nation, the more laws are necessary and the closer we get to a police state. That’s why those who wish to change the fundamental structure of government from an entity that serves the people to a people who serve the entity; subvert the moral fiber of society.

Take these simple steps today to break out of the bondage of government tyranny and into the liberty of the Holy Bible, the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution – all of which grant you far more freedom than the Permission State of America gives you.

  1. Read the Declaration of Independence today and read it with your family and friends. Discuss this wonderful document and hold it up next to the corrupt laws of the Permission State of America.
  2. Read the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights on a regular basis and be prepared to defend yourself in the event law enforcement tries to infringe on them.
  3. Be a participant in the political process. Start by committing to vote in every election and to have a basic working knowledge of each candidate.
  4. Read about the founding of America, the world view (Christian) of the majority of the settlers in the “New World”.

America the Permission State is soon to be America the Totalitarian Communist State unless you stand between the coalition forces of communists, atheists, fascists, socialists, neo-cons, and monarchist elites; and lovers of liberty, limited self government, and self responsibility.

This July 4th, make a decision. Does a police state America appeal to you? If so, do nothing. If you are like a growing group of Americans who are concerned about the lawlessness of your elected officials, get active immediately. Contact your local political party leaders. Join a Tea Party group in your area. Check out the John Birch Society. Your failure to act today will have a major effect on your children tomorrow.

Quotes on this page are from David Bartons videos and books, which are on sale at www.wallbuilders.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under Constitution, Socialism, Tea Party, Wars

Stunning 1997 SCOTUS Ruling The End Of ObamaCare?

Tenth Amendment Solutions Ray McBerry always hosts a good event. And Saturday’s (June 4th, 2011) Tenth Amendment Solutions presentation with Sheriff Mack was no exception. In fact, it turned out to be one of the most compelling forums for constitutional dialogue I have seen. Sheriff Mack, who looks every bit the part of a western Sheriff, lead the audience on a fast paced, sometimes emotional, and always thought provoking tour of the Constitution viewed through the lens of the 2nd Amendment. I am certain nearly everyone learned something new after listening to Mack’s presentation. However, is there a bigger picture here? Does Sheriff Mack’s battle against the Brady Bill in 1994 and his subsequent victory at the Supreme Court in 1997 spell the end of ObamaCare and the overreach of the US federal government? You decide. The SCOTUS decision appears at the end of this article. But let’s start at the beginning.

McBerry kicked off the Tenth Amendment Solutions summit with his trademark questions to an enthusiastic gathering of “Tenthers” that included; a GA State Representative, a sitting judge, police officer, and a variety of other Constitutional activists. “How many of you would agree we could use a little less federal government in our lives?”, asked McBerry. The audience answered with a thunderous approval. “Well, how many of you would agree we could use a lot less federal government in our lives?”, he asked again as everyone stood up and once again roared in the affirmative. “People everywhere are waking up to the fact that only limited government can restore American liberties.”, McBerry said. He went on say elected officials take an oath to defend the constitution and protect our liberties. Any government official not doing so is derelict of duty and must be removed from office or position.

With that send-off, Sheriff Mack took the dais and like a skilled college professor, lead the audience on an adventure in learning – a short course on the constitution from the perspective of the 2nd Amendment. While you might expect this to be an over-testosterone tainted, male gun toting diatribe, it was the opposite. Sheriff Mack weaved the constitution through the vision of our Founding Fathers, the needs of ordinary citizens, tyranny that comes naturally from a society deprived of its God given right to defend itself, and ultimately the real reason the 2nd Amendment was written. And in case you don’t know, the 2nd Amendment was written to give the citizens recourse against a tyrannical government.

The session was titled, “Interposition & The Local Sheriff”. Show of hands – how many of you know the County Sheriff is the highest constitutional officer in the County? In other words, the Sheriff has authority over every other official, including federal officers. The County Sheriff has the authority to arrest federal and state officials who enter his/her local jurisdiction if they break the law. And break the law they often do. One of Mack’s many important points was clarifying that the local elected Sheriff and local law enforcement is essential to liberty in the United States. This is because they answer to the local citizens. The alternative is a national police force which would answer to a central government someplace outside of the control of the local citizens. This undoubtedly would lead to more law enforcement officers sidestepping the constitution and exercising heavy handed or even illegal actions against innocent people.

Mack cited many examples of government officials enacting unconstitutional laws and then enforcing them. Treatment of blacks for example in the 50’s and 60’s was in clear violation of the US Constitution. He told the moving story of Rosa Parks and her decision not to give up her seat to a white man. How would Mack have handled the situation? He would have sat down next to her and made sure she safely got to her destination, in the seat she chose to sit in. That’s the true role of a law enforcement officer protecting a citizen’s constitutional rights, Mack reminded the audience.

Mack related how American citizens of Japanese descent were illegally rounded up and herded into what were essentially, concentration camps during World War II. No due process. No evidence of threats to the US. It was simply another example of government run amok.

Interposition is “the doctrine that an individual state of the U.S. may oppose any federal action it believes encroaches on its sovereignty.” (dictionary.com) Sheriff Mack clearly explained Article 1, Section 8 and how it places simple and easy to understand limits on federal power. The federal government was created by the states and given limited powers to be the agent of the states because it was just more practical to assign certain duties like national defense to a broader entity. But the Founding Fathers knew the creation of a federal government entity would lead to power struggles in the future.

Sure enough, the Alien and Sedition Act was signed into law in 1798. Characterized as unconstitutional by many, it violated the 1st Amendment (freedom of speech) and the tenth amendment limiting the powers of the federal government. Countless thousands of unconstitutional bills have subsequently been written and passed into law, subjecting citizens to oppression similar to that found in totalitarian regimes. In fact, some Constitutional scholars claim 80% of all federal laws today are unconstitutional.

“Where are the protectors of our constitutional rights – the same people who signed an oath of office to protect and defend the US Constitution?”, asks Sheriff Mack.

Elected officials, law enforcement officers, officials in the judicial system, and many other public servants swear an oath to defend the US Constitution. Mack says that oath requires law enforcement, elected officials, and the judiciary to protect an individual’s rights even if you don’t agree with that person’s actions – even if you don’t like that individual. In the case of the bigots trying to deny Rosa Parks her seat on the bus and other constitutional rights, Mack says police officers should instead have provided her safe escort home.

2nd Amendment rights are among the many rights trampled on by US state and federal law. Using outright lies, twisted facts, and the mouthpiece media; laws restricting citizens rights to self-protection number nearly 20,000 according to Sheriff Mack. Yet going back to Article 1, Section 8, Mack says the federal government has no authority to regulate, seize, or ban guns. In fact, governments that do so, often terrorize their own citizens. Government schools today don’t teach students that totalitarian regimes like Russia, China, Cambodia, and others killed hundreds of millions of their own people. Why? Because they could. The government had guns – the citizens didn’t.

In 1994, Sheriff Mack made a tough decision. The Brady Bill had just been passed and it specified a number of unconstitutional attacks on legitimate gun owners rights. To make matters worse, the federal law required local law enforcement to perform background checks, fingerprinting, and other intrusive and unconstitutional gun grabbing tasks. Mack decided to sue the federal government.

Working with the NRA, Mack sued based on several legal theories. One was the 10th Amendment and the other was the 5th Amendment. He ultimately was joined by just 6 other Sheriffs out of a total of 3,100 Sheriffs in the United States. The case Mack & Prinze vs. US Govt was won in in district court, lost on appeal, then went to the Supreme Court where they won a 5-4 decision.

Here is a summary of the Supreme Court decision on Mack vs US, June 27, 1997.

The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policy making is involved, and no case-by-case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.

Justice Antonin Scalia
United States Supreme Court Ruling
in Mack v. US., June 27, 1997

So, if you have read this far, can ObamaCare stand up to this judicial precedent?

Leave a comment

Filed under Constitution, Gun control, Health Care, States Rights

President Obama Endorses Nullification

Barack Obama Nullification Now

Barack Obama makes a case for nullification

Mr. Obama endorsed nullification of US federal law recently when he instructed US Attorney General Eric Holder to no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act. Reason: Mr. Obama believes it is unconstitutional. And it may be. Since I am far from being a constitutional scholar, I can only offer my layman’s thoughts on the matter. Quoting from www.domawatch.org, “The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman for purposes of all federal laws, and provides that states need not recognize a marriage from another state if it is between persons of the same sex.”

Mr. Obama is probably right in his assessment of the DOMA.  My limited knowledge of the constitutionality of DOMA suggests that it violates the 10th Amendment by telling states they have permission from the federal government to not recognize a marriage from another state. Why do the states need permission from the federal government? After all, according to www.domawatch.org, There are 30 states that have constitutional amendments protecting traditional marriage, including the three states (Arizona, California, and Florida) that passed constitutional amendments in November 2008. Do they really need the US federal government’s blessing on laws they themselves already passed on their own?

Whether Mr. Obama is correct or not, he has opened the door for nullification action on any and all laws that can be challenged from a constitutionally legal position. Consider a recent case reported in foxnews.com. I quote from the story; “Holder set aside the Board of Immigration Appeals ruling allowing the deportation to Ireland of Paul Wilson Dorman, a gay man illegally in the U.S. Dorman wants to stay in the country with his male partner, with whom he celebrated a civil union in New Jersey. The Board of Immigration Appeals judges had ruled against Dorman on the basis of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

Attorney General Holder intervened in the appeals case and asked if Dorman could be considered a “spouse” under New Jersey law if not for the Defense of Marriage Act. From foxnews.com, “This was an extraordinary measure by the Obama administration and demonstrates a clear commitment to nullify the Defense of Marriage Act,” [Gorman Attorney] Mundy said of Holder’s action. “It’s a far-reaching victory not only for same-sex couples but for immigration reform.” Here we have an attorney echoing a sitting US President on nullification of a US law.

Well well, Mr. President. I like your way of thinking. Why don’t we continue along by applying your theories to the socialist Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act  – which is considered unconstitutional by many legal scholars? Let’s start by nullifying it on a federal level. That’s if the current crop of CongressThugs and Senators in Name Only would have the guts to do so. They won’t – so why don’t you Mr. President?

Let’s also nullify the unconstitutional; Environmental Protection Agency, Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives Agency, USDA, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Labor, Department of Transportation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Farm Credit Administration, Farm Service Agency, Federal Citizen Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Federal Election Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Federal Financing Bank, Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds … The Federal Reserve …

OK – you get the point. America needs a breath of fresh, clean, non-polluted air. That can only come by nullification of most if not all the US unconstitutional federal agencies along with their stale, stagnant, polluted regulations.

But keep the “Endangered Species Committee” to lend a helping hand to government officials who are no longer needed.

Yes Mr. Obama – Nullification Now.

Leave a comment

Filed under Constitution, States Rights

Bankrupting America: The Globalist Template in Libya

US Predator Drone

Killing is easier when there's no pilot in the killing machine

Hey boys and girls – pop quiz time. Give me 5 good reasons the United States needs to meddle in the affairs of the sovereign nation of Libya. Give up? Here are a few “good” reasons:

  1. The US isn’t piling up enough war debt with boots on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq. The US federal government is so successful running its finances into the ground that it can surely afford more reckless spending.
  2. Global elites aren’t progressing fast enough with their program to destroy the American economy and create a single global currency they control. A few more wars should finish off the US economy permanently. Then the globalists can really control the money – and the US from some remote location only known by them.
  3. The international banking cartel also known as the US Federal Reserve hasn’t sucked enough dollars out taxpayer pockets on previous scams and schemes. Here we go again – more borrowing – more printing of fiat dollars – more interest payments for you and me! Thank you secret cartel at the Federal Reserve!
  4. Destabilizing Middle Eastern nations makes more Muslims hate the US creating an environment that fosters more wars. And more wars means more spending of dollars the US doesn’t have.
  5. It’s fun bullying smaller nations and it’s important to test out all the latest military hardware on countries that cannot defend themselves against a military under the control of shadowy elites. Didn’t you always want to see how effective a Predator Drone is – but not-in-your-backyard, of course.

And when you think it can’t get any worse, our good ole friends the Republicans are in the thick of it – encouraging more meddling, more bombing, more killing; in another nation that has no military importance to the US at all. They have not attacked the US, threatened the US in any way, nor have they interfered in US domestic policy – as the US government so often does in other countries.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is publicly urging the President to raise US level of involvement in Libya by directly taking out Libyan President Muammar al-Qaddafi. He’s using time tested propaganda: if the US doesn’t take down the Libyan government, the US risks a protracted war in Libya.

Now I have an idea Mr. Graham – why doesn’t the US mind its own business? How about bowing out of Libya now and commit to a policy of our Founding Fathers which is to avoid foreign entanglements and engage other nations in commerce only. But of course that doesn’t line pockets anywhere near as fast as good ole fashioned wars started by subversives. Like the kind suggested by a another Republican.

Former Presidential Candidate and Republican John McCain is also urging greater US action in Libya. But he wants to pursue a different course. Let’s train and equip the rebels to help them overturn their government. This is standard US policy. Send subversives into a country and use them to force a regime change. While normal everyday folks like you and me might wonder why the US is assisting Al-Qaeda backed operatives in Libya and killing them in Iraq and Afghanistan; don’t worry – the shadowy group running the US from an office at the UN, knows what it’s doing.

The US economy and the rest of its problems will never be fixed with the current leadership at the Federal level. The globalist agenda promoted by the puppets in the Senate and Congress can be halted by simply placing term limits on Republicans and Democrats. Do we need a special law to do so? No – just vote Constitution Party in 2012. Check out the Constitution Party Platform. Join today and get active.

Put and end to endless wars. Return to a sound economy. Bring US jobs back to the US. Reverse years of attacks on the US Constitution.

Go there now: Constitution Party. While we still have a functioning Constitution in the image of America’s Founding Fathers.

One more thing. The Tea Party must end its love affair with Republicans and embrace the only party that stands for liberty, freedom, and a truly free market economy in the US. Ask your local Tea Party officials who they back and if its Republicans – ask why?

2 Comments

Filed under Constitution, Tea Party, Wars

Tragic shooting brings trash talkers out in force

Rep Steny Hoyer D-MD

Mr. Hoyer, it's time you retired

They blame the internet. They blame the proliferation of news venues. It’s talk radio. Soon, they’ll suggest  our right to own firearms is the cause of the tragic shootings in Tucson, AZ. It’s anything other than the truth. The liars pour out of the woodwork like a giant swarm of termites. And these same individuals doing all the blaming – are just like an infestation of termites hiding where you can’t see them, eating away at the fabric of this once great nation.

Sunday’s Fox News website shows the deceivers in action. First from Pima County, Ariz., Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, “”I think the vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business and what (we) see on TV and how our youngsters are being raised, that this has not become the nice United States of America that most of us grew up in.” Well duh Sheriff. And who’s fault is that – the Tea Party? I didn’t know the Tea Party has been around for the past 10 decades rotting America out at the core.

Sheriff Dupnik, exercising our rights to free speech is not the reason 12 people were tragically shot. You are shamelessly using this terrible crime by an evil, despicable, individual as an excuse to bash talk radio and other free unbiased media. Talk radio has been the only news venue with an opposing opinion to the mouthpiece government puff piece media. That’s why it has been so successful. The American people are not fooled by the pathetic vomit that is issued daily by what’s known as the mainstream media. In fact, news purveyors such as the New York Times have long force fed lies disguised as “news” to the American public. Check out Accuracy in Media for just one sample of many.

Incredibly, US Congressman Steny Hoyer, D-Md says, “we grew up listening to essentially three major news outlets: NBC, ABC, and of course, CBS. We listened to people like Walter Cronkite and Eric Sevareid, and Huntley-Brinkley, and they saw their job as to inform us of the facts and we would make a conclusion … Far too many broadcasts now and so many outlets have the intent of inciting, and inciting people to opposition, to anger, to thinking the other side is less than moral. And I think that is a context in which somebody who is mentally unbalanced can somehow feel justified in taking this kind of action. (From Fox News)

Wow, did this sitting Congressman ever read the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold? What uninformed fools voted for this guy? His comments suggest he favors a totalitarian state controlled media system that would dish out whatever distortions were needed to control the American serfs. Talk radio and the new media blogs have more than done yeoman’s duty in terms of bringing the truth to the American public. In fact, it is commonly known that it was news outlets like World Net Daily that busted the global warming scam. You never would have seen nor heard a word about the scam on the mouthpiece media. It took courageous alternative media to alert the world that a small group of globalists were working on a world tax scam to fleece the masses using fake global warming data.

Even more frightening, FBI Director Robert Mueller said in the same Fox News report, “that the ‘ubiquitous nature of the Internet’ has made hateful information much more readily available to individuals than it was eight or 10 or 15 years ago and that absolutely presents a challenge to us particularly as it relates to lone wolfs.” So Sir, in order to make Americans safer, why not slap new central government, communist China style controls over the internet? Yeah – that’s what’s needed!

Hey – let’s not forget to blame the Tea Party. From the Huffington Post; “Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), who represents a district adjacent to Gabrielle Giffords’s, said that Saturday’s shooting is a consequence of the vitriolic rhetoric that has arisen over the past few years among extreme elements of the Tea Party.” Once again, we see an elected official who just doesn’t get it. Actually, he does get it. He parrots the same socialist-communist line most of the Democrats dispense like pushers handing heroin out free to new users.

It’s good that the gunman was caught. He deserves the death penalty. But not before he is thoroughly interviewed to determine just how this allegedly unstable man came to fire weapons into a crowd of innocent people. There’s a lot more to this story that needs to come out. And the mainstream mouthpiece media will never deliver the truth to a nation that needs to hear it. I can count on Talk Radio, World Net Daily, Newsmax, and other true news outlets to get the truth out and so can you.

Steny Hoyer photo credit: http://weaselzippers.us/2011/01/05/steny-hoyer-tea-partiers-come-from-unhappy-families/

Leave a comment

Filed under Civil Rights, Constitution, Gun control, Tea Party